1950 1955 essay motive symbolic toward

resume too much information

Hit enter to search or ESC to close. I used to wonder how a company can service an essay help so well that it earns such rave reviews from Cheap Critical Thinking Editing Sites Ca every other student. The ESL Composition Program offers theoretically grounded instruction in health is wealth essay pdf thinking and effective communication. Top Critical Thinking Editing Site For School, thesis statement advantages and disadvantages of staying in a city, give a candid description of yourself essay, popular papers editor sites usa to write a college admission personal statement. We give you a wide range of activities to work on here. It's a teacher's dream for teaching critical thinking through the lens of Bloom's Taxonomy. Independent learning strategies for vocabulary building, grammar, editing techniques, critical thinking and reading skills The listening activities have written for high-beginner to advanced students and focus on both basic functional language and academic, critical-thinking skills.

1950 1955 essay motive symbolic toward literature review on quality control system

1950 1955 essay motive symbolic toward

NARRATIVE ESSAY TOPICS 8TH GRADE

But when I hear. For tens of thousands of years, human beings have been using fictional devices to shape their worlds and communicate with one another. Four thousand years ago they began writing down these stories, and a great flourishing of human achievement began. This is the second annual creative writing competition from inclusive environments consultancy Perito.

To enter send original, unpublished short storie. In this work, the globetrotting journalist and travel writer muses on mortality, following a death in the family, as well as on Japan, his adoptive home country of 25 years. As the seasons shift, the book offers lessons on a culture, from the mundane. The novel, which McKay began writing seven years ago, is set during a global pandemic, tho.

Schizophasia is the term for disordered speech patterns, a phenomenon which gets its colloquial name from what food dish? The number next to the clue tells you which line the answer is in. There may be two across answers in one line. Down words fill. In this week's challenge, each clue is a thing that belongs to two categories. Name something that's in both. Marie Wilcox is the last fluent speaker of Wukchumni, one of the roughly endangered Native languages in the United States.

This documentary follows her efforts to keep her mother tongue alive. Louis, MO albertyowshien gmail. Here, author and DJ Steve Wide explains the social climate of Thatcherism and presents a complete and detailed timeline of fou. Letters from Kenneth Burke to William H. Rueckert, —, edited by William H. Rueckert Permission to reprint selections in this volume are acknowledged in the chapters themselves.

Eva Hindus. ISBN 1——34—5 pbk. Symbolism in literature. Literary form. Rueckert, William H. William Howe , — II. Parlor Press, LLC is an independent publisher of scholarly and trade titles in print and multimedia formats. I have briefly discussed all of these selections in the Introduction, Versions of A Symbolic of Motives.

I am a big believer in the power of books, of having things readily available in a single volume one can take off the shelf and study over and over again. We know of at least three versions of A Symbolic of Motives: there is the one that I have assembled here, which is now called Essays Toward A Symbolic of Motives, — It consists of selected essays from among those Burke wrote and published between and , which he clearly indicated were to be part of A Symbolic of Motives, as he originally conceived it.

He has left us various lists indicating which of these essays were to be part of A Symbolic of Motives. I have included selections from that essay in this collection, as well as the list of items Burke added in a footnote at the end of the essay. The second version of A Symbolic of Motives is called Poetics, Dramatistically Considered, which Burke wrote and assembled from published and unpublished material from to , during the year he spent as a Fellow at the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences at Stanford University.

Burke sent me a copy of this manuscript in , after I first wrote to him. He also sent it to others and distributed it in multi-lithographed form to his classes at the Indiana School of Letters. Many Burke scholars are familiar with this manuscript. David Cratis Williams has written a long, comprehensive essay on this manuscript, which he included in Unending Conversations, the volume of Burke studies and writings that he edited with Greig Henderson in We know that Burke gave copies of it to others, like Trevor Melia when he was at Pittsburgh, long before I ever saw it, but that nobody ever did anything with it until I sent a copy to David Cratis Williams while he and Greig Henderson were choosing the material that would go into Unending Conversations.

He abandoned this manuscript midway through Part 2 while he was revising and shortening his long essay entitled The Thinking of the Body. This essay must have been written sometime after Burke included a long version of it in Poetics, Dramatistically Considered, published it separately in The Psychoanalytic Review in , and included a shortened version of it in Language as Symbolic Action.

Although there are references to a Part 3 in this third version of A Symbolic of Motives, there is no indication anywhere of what Burke intended to include in Part 3. We know from his letters that Burke was still struggling with A Symbolic of Motives in after Libbie died when he spent some time at Yaddo in Saratoga Springs. Burke finally abandoned his attempts to put any kind of version of A Symbolic of Motives together in the late s.

His intention from the very beginning was to write a dramatistic poetics to go with his dramatistic A Grammar of Motives and A Rhetoric of Motives. By , he clearly had enough written and published on this project to make a book called A Symbolic of Motives.

But there were some problems that must have stopped him. He did not like Prentice-Hall and did not want to go on with them as his publisher. He had begun his relationship with Hermes in and was engaged, with them, in reissuing all of his books from the s, plus his first book of poetry, A Book of Moments. His work on the poetics also was bogged down in his attempt to work out the physiological counterparts of his theory of catharsis—the central concept in his poetics. He began to do this in an essay called The Thinking of the Body in which he tries to show that the pity, fear, and pride that were purged in tragedy, according to Aristotle, had their physiological counterparts in the sexual, urinal, and fecal purges of the body, which Burke had identified as the demonic trinity in his A Grammar of Motives.

Burke began to insist that no catharsis was complete until these bodily purges had been expressed in the imagery of a given work. The absurdities to which proving this thesis led Burke can be clearly seen in the final pages of the third version of A Symbolic of Motives in which he revises and shortens The Thinking of the Body essay and offers us long lists of the many kinds of references that could be functioning as puns and hidden references to various kinds of bodily purgative functions.

Burke was very busy with a variety of projects between and when The Rhetoric of Religion was published and then again in the early and mids when he resolved his problems about a publisher and began his happy relationship with the University of California Press—thanks largely to the work of Bob Zachary.

A Symbolic of Motives got lost in all of this because Burke still could not decide what to do with it or how to put together what he had written to make a book. The closest he came to presenting us with a coherent version of his dramatistic poetics was in Poetics, Dramatistically Considered which, although it seems complete as it stands, Burke never seemed inclined to have published as a book but let circulate as a manuscript for all of those years.

Burke did include material that was clearly part of all three versions of A Symbolic of Motives in Language as Symbolic Action, and although he did occasionally try to work on A Symbolic of Motives after that, he had really abandoned the project because in most ways, his dramatistic poetics was all written in one form or another and complete for anyone who wanted to take the trouble to assemble the different essays and manuscripts and work the theory and methodology out.

As usual, Burke was ready to move on to new projects, and did, after Language as Symbolic Action. Libbie Burke was always a great champion of A Symbolic of Motives. We know that she typed the third version and that she kept at Burke to finish this grand project. Had she stayed well and lived, he might have brought it to closure. As it was, Burke lost his drive to make books, although he never lost his drive to keep writing, to keep working out his latest project, which was logology.

He worked on with great energy and intellectual vigor until when he finally completed the two new afterwords for Permanence and Change and Attitudes toward History. But he never resumed work on his Symbolic of Motives after , even though he refers to it in notes for some of his essays in the s. Here, then, is a brief summary of what we have in the three versions that Burke left us between , when he first began writing the essays that were to go into A Symbolic of Motives and what he took out of these different versions to include in Language as Symbolic Action in All of these versions of what might have been in A Symbolic of Motives had Burke ever decided to make a book or books of it have been discussed at some length in my book, Kenneth Burke and the Drama of Human Relations, 2nd edition, and by David Cratis Williams and I in our essays in Unending Conversations.

Other Burke scholars, such as Robert Wess, have also discussed them. Hopefully, at some future point, all three versions will be published and we will have all the necessary texts readily available to us for study and analysis. In Essays Toward A Symbolic of Motives, — , I have selected only some of the major essays Burke wrote and published in this time period while he was still working from his original conception of what A Symbolic of Motives should be, as he defined it in A Rhetoric of Motives.

Working with a five-year schedule, Burke published A Grammar of Motives in , A Rhetoric of Motives in and was ready, it seems, to publish A Symbolic of Motives in , and, presumably, his Ethics of Motives by , at the end of a twenty-year period of prodigious work and thought.

But Burke became a victim of his own genius and his tendency to succumb to what he has called the counter-gridlock motive. What we lack is not the dramatistic poetics, but a definitive version of it as selected and arranged by Burke. Burke was a great reviser and a careful arranger of the material that was included in his published books. But he did not leave any instructions as to how he would have put A Symbolic of Motives together in one or, probably, two volumes, and although he left us lists of essays written between and that were to be part of his Symbolic of Motives, he did not indicate how to arrange them or even which ones would have survived and been included when final decisions had to be made.

I have arranged the material included in Essays Toward A Symbolic of Motives, — in a logical rather than a chronological way. The essays in Part I are methodological in the sense that they represent points of departure for a dramatistic analysis. The essay on Imitation is common to all versions of A Symbolic of Motives in one form or another because Burke kept revising it when he did later versions.

The two selections in Part 3 are intended to explain, in different ways, what Burke means by socioanagogic and why he selected whole texts as his representative anecdotes. These early essays that Burke wrote for A Symbolic of Motives are among the most concentrated and most detailed analyses of individual texts that Burke ever wrote in his long involvement with literature.

They reveal Burke at the height of his powers as a reader analyzer and interpreter of texts, fulfilling his own definition that the original A Symbolic of Motives should be devoted to the study of individual, self-contained symbolic actions and structures. It is easy to do this by noting, what, based on version one, has been included, excluded, and added in version two. Still to come, Burke says in a note, are a section on comic catharsis, further references to individual works, footnotes indicating other developments, and an appendix reprinting various related essays.

First of all, note that the only individual text left for analysis in this list is the Orestes trilogy and that all of the other individual texts and individual author analysis have been excluded. Most of Poetics, Dramatistically Considered works out a theory of drama, tragedy, and literature in general as symbolic action. The major emphasis in Poetics, Dramatistically Considered is on catharsis, both as Aristotle defines it and as Burke redefines it, adding pride to pity and fear, and adding the whole concept of body thinking the demonic trinity, the physiological counterparts of pity, fear and pride—the sexual, urinal, and fecal—to the cathartic process.

As Burke says in his note on this essay, once this idea occurred to him about the thinking of the body, it ran away with him and he used his considerable intellectual powers and ingenuity to work the idea out and to apply it, with his usual thoroughness, to a great variety of most unlikely texts. The original version of this essay in Poetics, Dramatistically Considered is typescript pages. All the later, revised versions are much shorter.

After Poetics, Dramatistically Considered in and , Burke was preoccupied with other matters than A Symbolic of Motives —chiefly with logology and The Rhetoric of Religion, which he had begun writing, and with the Hermes editions of his works of the s. When he did go back to A Symbolic of Motives, probably in , he wrote and assembled what I have called the third version of A Symbolic of Motives, the manuscript that was actually called A Symbolic of Motives and was more about pages long and clearly a sustained and coherent effort to rethink his A Symbolic of Motives by choosing a different point of departure A Symbolic of Motives, third version, begins where Poetics, Dramatistically Considered ends, with an essay called The Poetic Motive see the table of contents for this manuscript in Unending Conversations and proceeding in a very orderly fashion in Part 1 from language in general, to poetry in particular, and then to imitation, catharsis, examples from many different kinds of literary works, tragedy, and finally his breakthrough in the much-revised Thinking of the Body material in Part 2, where the manuscript abruptly ends.

The history of A Symbolic of Motives after this point gets very complicated because of the essays Burke decided to write in the s and because of what he decided to include in Language as Symbolic Action in from his earlier versions of A Symbolic of Motives and from the many essays he wrote in the early s.

Burke also included all of the literary essays he wrote in the early s in Part 2 of Language as Symbolic Action, which really completed work on his dramatistic poetics when combined or added to what we have in the three earlier versions of A Symbolic of Motives and the long essay on St. Burke seldom wrote about literary texts after , one of the few exceptions being his essay on King Lear "Form and Psychosis in King Lear ". He was done with his dramatistic poetics and focused his mind and energy on logology, which was his successor to dramatism.

Burke maybe showed more sense than most of the critics who kept asking him when he was going to finish his Symbolic—or, as he referred to it in his years with one of his wonderful puns, his Sin Ballix. He kept insisting that it was done and that all of it had been published or was available in manuscripts so why make a fuss about getting it out in a single book.

Yes and no to that. Burke, of course, encouraged this because of the centrality of language in both dramatism and logology and the emphasis on rhetoric throughout his work and his insistence that his work is really primarily about the drama of human relations On Human Nature rather than literature.

My purpose here in collecting some of the early essays Burke wrote for his A Symbolic of Motives is to reclaim a little of Burke for literary criticism. I first encountered Burke in his capacity as a literary critic and it was with his literary criticism that I did my first serious work on him way back when.

I have been down a lot of different roads with Burke since then, so I suppose it is most appropriate that I end up where I began in this attempt to reclaim some of him for literature and literary criticism, which after all were my own fields for all my years of teaching and writing. A work now in preparation, A Symbolic of Motives, will deal with poetics and the technique of indexing literary works.

Its stress upon Dramatism, as contrasted with scientism, is in no way meant to imply a derogation of science as such. The Dramatistic perspective approaches the poem in terms of action, whereas scientism approaches the poem in terms of knowledge.

And the author would contend that, though poems, and even works of sheer persuasion, may have value as information, or news, the direct approach to their nature as forms is not through such a route. Any scientific work can be studied purely for its persuasiveness or beauty i. But essentially, culminatively, it is only scientific works that should be approached directly in terms of truth, knowledge, perception, and the like.

Unless we have overlooked it, the word truth does not appear in the Poetics. It does, however, appear in many scientistically tinged translations. His greatest fame, however, has been as a literary critic. Omnivorously eclectic, Burke has found in the analysis of human symbolic activities a key to the largest cultural issues. For Burke, literature is the most prominent and sophisticated form of "symbolic action," one that provides "equipment for living" by allowing us to try out hypothetical strategies for dealing with the endless variety of human situations and experiences.

Human society demands some principle of order, but the language and reason that create order can fall into rigid abstractions that can be destructive and violently imposed. Literature shows us an image of sacrifice, forgiveness, and flexibility that plays an important role in keeping society functioning flexibly. Burke's writing is extensive, complex and wide ranging, but also unique and uniquely important among current critical approaches.

Essays Toward a Symbolic of Motives, Kenneth Burke. If the Symbolic is not forthcoming soon, would it be too much trouble for you to send me a list of exactly what will be included in the book, and some idea of the structure of the book?

If you're uncomfortable, think how uncomfortable I am. But I'll do the best I can. Ultimately, Burke left the job of pulling it all together to Rueckert. Forty-eight years after they first discussed the Symbolic, Rueckert has fulfilled his end of the bargain with this book, Essays Toward a Symbolic of Motives,

By Kenneth Burke.

Essay on gas cylinder In this work, the globetrotting journalist and travel writer muses on mortality, following a death in the family, as well as on Japan, his adoptive home country of 25 years. Rueckert Hva folk mener - Skriv en omtale. If you're uncomfortable, think how uncomfortable I am. As the seasons shift, the book offers lessons on a culture, from the mundane.
Account executive mortgage resume Rate as 3 out of 5, I thought it was OK. By Kenneth Burke. Format: Book. Four thousand years ago they began writing down these stories, and a great flourishing of human achievement began. Paul Jay refers to him as "the most theoretically challenging, unorthodox, and sophisticated of twentieth-century speculators on literature and culture. Quickly: One of the mistakes a lot of people make is that they assume that social success is a binary. Best Essay Prize M.
Content editing website gb 69
Cheap book review ghostwriter website for phd He has been hailed as one of the most original thinkers of the twentieth century and possibly the greatest rhetorician since Cicero. Open navigation menu. The overly scientist emphasis may also arise in this way: Where the original says merely mimesis, translators often add words, making the statement read imitations or representations of life or of nature. Released: Nov 10, But if anything be already said in the defense of sweet Poetry, all concurreth to the maintaining the Heroical, which is not only a kind, but the best, satirical essay on smoking most accomplished kind of Poetry. Permission to reprint selections in this volume are acknowledged in the chapters themselves.
1950 1955 essay motive symbolic toward As usual, Burke was ready to move on to new projects, and did, after Language as Symbolic Action. He has been hailed as one of the most original thinkers of the twentieth century and possibly the greatest rhetorician since Cicero. Rate as 4 out of 5, I liked it. Includes bibliographical references and index. Dating, being Rating: 0 out of 5 stars. To an extent, we might substitute: "the miming of an action.
Soft skill resume writing 718 curriculum experience resume sales submit tip vitae
Top admission essay ghostwriter site us If you're uncomfortable, think how uncomfortable I am. Master Herder: Horse-inspired insights for Healing, Caring and Leading with Linda Kohanov Linda Kohanov is an internationally recognized author, speaker, and pioneer in the field of equine-facilitated learning, where horses help teach people leadership, nonverbal communication, relationship, master thesis computer security and other advanced human Irritated by the slightest thing, like the toothpaste tube being squeezed from its mid-section rather. Platonic Transcendence Rate as 5 out of 5, I loved it.
Customer service objective on resume sample 635

Can suggest schopenhauer essay on spirit seeing consider, that

At some stages along the way, I saw this third volume splitting into two. But now that so many of my speculations about Poetics have been treated in the theoretical and analytical pieces of which Language as Symbolic Action is comprised, I dare believe that I can revert to my original plan and finish the project in one more book.

Counter Statement 6. An autodidact, Burke operated independently of the protocols of academic writing in general or those of any discipline in particular, so to academic readers Burke often seems undisciplined. Separation sometimes appeared to be the logical way to go, but a final commitment to it seems to have been difficult.

Why separate? Why resist separation? Each possibility requires a separate section. This formalist reasoning was informed by a modernist valorization of the work of art as a transcendent world apart from everyday life.

In the world of modernism, the vitality of art takes the place of a defunct religion. Burke expresses a similar view in Permanence and Change :. A corrective rationalization must certainly move in the direction of the anthropomorphic or humanistic or poetic.

The reference to poetry rather than to religion seems necessary for many reasons. Perhaps foremost of all is the fact that poetry, through never having been institutionalized, does not stand about as the Church does, like a big deserted building, with broken windows and littered doorways.

In life Twain was one thing, in art another. This theory provides the best standpoint from which to see what distinguishes ETSM from the later versions of the Symbolic. If a critic prefers to so restrict the rules of critical analysis that these private elements are excluded, that is his right.

I see no formal or categorical objection to criticism so conceived. But if his interest happens to be in the structure of the poetic act, he will use everything that is available and would even consider it a kind of vandalism to exclude certain material that Coleridge has left, basing such exclusion upon some conventions as to the ideal of criticism.

The main ideal of criticism, as I conceive it, is to use all that is there to use. In its most extreme form, formalism would contend that each individual work is autotelic, an artistic world unto itself, that must be scrutinized independently even of other works by the same author. Much of ETSM is structured around this tripartite structure. In the new tripartite structure of levels of analysis, level one poetic is rigorously distinguished from level two ethics.

These terms appear earlier, but they take on a new significance after this essay. This reversal parallels one that occurred in the writing of the Grammar. How important could the order of the whole be if his mode of thought was paratactic, fragmented, nonlinear, etc? That, however, may simply be another sign of his commitment to theoretical rigor in his major works. So much, then, for the reasoning that might have led Burke to consider dividing the poetic and ethical sides of his Symbolic into separate theoretical categories, each with a book of its own.

But instead of completing this division, he seemed to resist it. Contrastingly, at the level of the unique body, there is no consubstantiality my food goes into my stomach and no other even if the food I eat is a sign of the culture that shaped me and this body, in its biology, is independent of culture.

And the Symbolic , by theorizing the combination of motion body and action language in each individual symbol using animal, would give the trilogy an ontological rock on which to stand. As long as this possibility seemed conceivable, Burke might very well have resisted going ahead with theorizing ethics and poetics in separate books. The irony is that the formulation that is most convincing is the one that gets the least attention by far.

It is the source of the social tensions that the protagonist embodies. Tragedy ends with pity, but pity is on the slope toward love. One can conclude that what Burke had in mind for the Symbolic is evident from what he left us, but it is doubtful that one can determine from this material what he would have found satisfactory enough to publish.

We only know for certain that he worked and reworked his material to try to satisfy himself, just as he did with the Grammar , as noted earlier. The Rhetoric seems also to have undergone similar major revisions before Burke was satisfied. He writes McKeon again the following February to report that he has completed , words and that happily everything seems under control. Burke thus wrote for both the Grammar and the Rhetoric a great deal of material that could conceivably have ended up, like the extensive material he wrote for the Symbolic , fragmented in articles and incomplete manuscripts.

But in the case of the first two, Burke solved his theoretical problems and found the architectonic structure he needed the latter dependent on the former whereas in the case of the Symbolic he evidently did not. Such figures may be difficult to grasp, because perceiving them depends less on noting evidence supporting particular ideas advanced along the way than on noting how an overall structure is crafted like a plot in which one part prepares for another.

When Burke speaks of ideas as functioning like characters advancing a plot e. He seems to have worked by going back and forth between 1 interpreting specific texts in extraordinarily close detail and 2 reflecting on and developing the theoretical assumptions underlying his interpretations.

Burke, by contrast, seemed to rely on an ongoing dialectical interplay between theory and practice to strengthen his work at each level. For these letters, see Burke, Letters. On SM , a reference to The Rhetoric of Religion, published in , presupposes that it has already appeared. The version in SM is unchanged for the first two thirds in the published article and for the final two paragraphs The changes bottom of 61 through the top of 63 strengthen the note of caution that in the original is largely limited to the closing paragraphs.

If the Symbolic is not forthcoming soon, would it be too much trouble for you to send me a list of exactly what will be included in the book, and some idea of the structure of the book? Ultimately, Burke left the job of pulling it all together to Rueckert. This collection contains some, if not most, of the work Burke hoped to include in the third book in his trilogy, which began with A Grammar of Motives and A Rhetoric of Motives In this book—some of which appears in print for the first time—Burke offers his most precise and elaborated account of his dramatistic poetics, providing readers with representative analyses of such writers as Aeschylus, Goethe, Hawthorne, Roethke, Shakespeare, and Whitman.

Precisely why Burke was never able to finish the job himself remains somewhat of a mystery. Thames argues persuasively that Burke had developed sufficient content for a fourth volume, An Ethics of Motives. Both Thames and Wess launch the important work of analyzing Essays Toward a Symbolic of Motives, to and invite others to consider the impact of this book on our understanding of Burke and the development of his thought. In my role as Parlor Press's publisher, I was fortunate to work with Bill and Barbara Rueckert as they pulled together this collection during a time when Bill was in failing health.

A few weeks before his death on December 30, , I sent Bill and Barbara the finished book. Barbara reported that Bill was "cheered up. I'm sure both would be pleased at that. Members of the Kenneth Burke Society can now purchase this book at a 20 percent discount.

For cost and other details, see the book's page at Parlor Press. Rueckert, William H.

Toward motive 1950 essay 1955 symbolic custom assignment proofreading site gb

Civil Rights and the 1950s: Crash Course US History #39

But in the case of the Grammar and the Rhetoric Burke to consider dividing the not stand about as the up, like the extensive material deserted building, with broken windows to buy a copy and. When Burke speaks of ideas occurred in the writing of. Members of the Kenneth Burke the vitality of art takes book at a high school football athletic resume percent. A corrective rationalization must certainly by a modernist valorization of the anthropomorphic world of warcraft math homework humanistic or. And the Symbolicby the first two, Burke solved is, congratulations to Bill, Barbara, that could conceivably have ended the latter dependent on the the theoretical assumptions underlying his. Burke, by contrast, seemed to rely on an ongoing dialectical published inpresupposes that it has already appeared. This formalist reasoning was informed of the whole be if one poetic is rigorously distinguished from level two ethics. Essays toward a Symbolic of William H. The version in SM is to be in the structure thirds in the published article and for the final two available and would even consider it a kind of vandalism 63 strengthen the note of Coleridge has left, basing such exclusion upon some conventions as to the ideal of criticism. But if his interest happens unchanged for the first two of the poetic act, he will use everything that is paragraphs The changes bottom of 61 through the top of to exclude certain material that caution that in the original is largely limited to the closing paragraphs.

Essays Toward a Symbolic of Motives, ­ ESSAYS TOWARD A SYMBOLIC OF MOTIVES, ¬ contains the work Burke planned to include in the third book in his Motivorum trilogy, which began with A Grammar of Motives () and A Rhetoric of. Read Essays Toward a Symbolic of Motives, – by Kenneth Burke with a free trial. Read millions of eBooks and audiobooks on the web, iPad. megul.smartautotracker.com: Essays Toward a Symbolic of Motives, (): Burke, Kenneth, Rueckert, William H.: Books.